Skip to main content

Sprint 4 Meeting Records

This document is a concise record of Sprint 4 planning, stabilisation, testing, and review discussions from 28 September through 9 October 2026. It is derived from the retained raw meeting transcript, the client-meeting record, and repository implementation evidence.

Sprint Context​

  • Delivery focus: stabilise the multi-discipline product before final submission rather than add broad new functionality.
  • Work tracking: the team coordinated through the Sprint 4 backlog, Gitea issues and pull requests, the bug tracker, and deployed-app testing.
  • Quality expectation: correct relay and statistics semantics, responsive event logging, usable mobile layouts, safe deployment, and end-to-end validation.

28-30 September 2026: Sprint 4 Scope and Fix Allocation​

Discussed​

  • The team reviewed multi-discipline logging and identified remaining product defects after Sprint 3 delivery work.
  • Aaliah Reddy allocated logo work, mobile UI work, and relay work across the team.
  • The group identified athlete-graph, calendar, delete-dialog, relay attendance, stale squad UI, calendar wording, comparison, public-link, and discipline-catalogue refinements.
  • The team arranged the 1 October client meeting and confirmed that documentation would be updated after implementation work settled.

Decisions and Outcomes​

  • Sprint 4 was defined as a correction and validation sprint, not a feature-expansion sprint.
  • Relay attendance and registration behaviour, mobile UI, statistics/graphs, and public-logger workflows were prioritised.
  • Unused squads and unnecessary UI were identified for removal or follow-up cleanup.

Evidence from the Raw Transcript​

  • 28 September: the transcript records final multi-discipline logger checks, official-result selection, undo behaviour, and the need to separate completed work from unresolved follow-up.
  • 29 September, 20:16-22:45: Aaliah Reddy assigned logo, mobile UI, and relay work; fixed athlete graphs, calendar, and deletion behaviour; and listed remaining relay, UI, calendar, and comparison issues.
  • 30 September, 17:28-21:33: the team planned the client meeting, discussed documentation timing, reviewed the discipline catalogue, and confirmed unused squads could be removed.

1 October 2026: Client Demonstration​

Discussed​

  • The team demonstrated the application to Harshil, who was satisfied with the product.
  • The team explained the remaining relay-logic, graph/statistics, mobile UI, and performance fixes.

Decisions and Outcomes​

  • The client feedback became focused stabilisation work documented in the Sprint 4 Client Meetings record.
  • No new feature scope or user stories were introduced.

3-9 October 2026: Final Bug Fixes, Performance, and Showcase Preparation​

Discussed​

  • The team prioritised mobile UI, branding cleanup, athlete PB/SB and progression correctness, performance-log data, event-date filtering, relay statistics, live-logger behaviour, and performance.
  • A structured performance plan identified targeted local updates, bulk roster operations, async finalisation, shared caches, and query improvements as the appropriate approach.
  • The group tested deployment, weather, mobile layout, and final user flows while preparing documentation and a showcase.

Decisions and Outcomes​

  • Unused cover-image, email-invite, and squad UI was removed or scheduled for removal where it did not support the product workflow.
  • PB/SB and progression corrections, relay statistics work, mobile fixes, API rate limiting, and performance improvements were completed or validated incrementally.
  • The team agreed that Sprint 4 did not introduce new product functionality, so a new user-stories document was unnecessary.
  • Final validation focused on relay logic, official-result selection, recording, finalisation, mobile UI, and a final showcase of the deployed application.

Evidence from the Raw Transcript​

  • 3 October, 12:47-16:31: Aaliah Reddy and Vareshan Rajah coordinated remaining fixes, mobile UI triage, and logo work.
  • 4 October, 20:16-21:34: the group identified PB/SB, progression, performance-log, relay-statistics, and live-logger defects, then recorded the performance-improvement approach.
  • 5-7 October: Aaliah Reddy and Vikram Mahalingam recorded PB/SB repairs, progression and layout work, Gitea deployment disruption, and deployment recovery.
  • 8 October, 13:13-17:51: Vareshan Rajah reported mobile UI completion; Vikram Mahalingam reported API, authentication, and AI rate limiting; the team continued deployment and performance checks.
  • 9 October, 13:15: Aaliah Reddy requested final application checking and a showcase, while identifying logger recording, official selection, and finalisation as the remaining performance focus.

AI Declaration​

This document was synthesized from supplied project-chat evidence and client-meeting notes with the assistance of OpenCode[openai/gpt-5.6-terra].